CMA Exam Part Order (2026): Which Part Should You Take First?

Choosing the right CMA review course determines how effectively you connect managerial accounting theory to corporate financial performance. With the ICMA transitioning to spreadsheet-driven Computer-Based Questions in September 2026, candidates require interactive testing platforms that replicate Prometric exam environments without imposing multi-thousand dollar upfront package costs.

Key facts

• Certification: Professional Exam Licensure
• Blueprint Standard: Official 2024-2026 Examination Specifications
• Preparation Focus: Active retrieval practice, Prometric simulation, and pacing stamina
• Target Score: Exceeding official passing benchmarks on first examination attempt
• Study Commitment: 15–20 hours per week dedicated preparation

Recommended CMA Part Sequencing Strategies

Strategy	Recommended Order	Best Suited For	Core Rationale	Key Trade-Off
The Operational Baseline (Recommended)	Part 1 → Part 2	Corporate accountants, controllers, cost accountants, recent accounting grads	Part 1 builds the cost structure, budgeting, and performance metrics required in Part 2	Part 1 has a wider breadth of technical accounting and variance formulas
The Strategic Finance Track	Part 2 → Part 1	Financial analysts, investment bankers, treasury professionals, finance majors	Capital budgeting, WACC, and decision analysis build on financial finance background	Delays foundational cost allocation and internal control principles
The 2026 CBQ Transition Track	Part 1 (Early) → Part 2 (Post-Sept)	Candidates testing across the 2026 format update	Locks in traditional essay formats early or coordinates with the CBQ spreadsheet release	Requires adapting to spreadsheet exhibit updates between sections

---

1. Why Part 1 Is the Best Starting Point for Most Candidates

Part 1 covers six primary operational and managerial accounting domains:

1. External Financial Reporting Decisions (15%)
2. Planning, Budgeting, and Forecasting (20%)
3. Performance Management (20%)
4. Cost Management (15%)
5. Internal Controls (15%)
6. Technology and Analytics (15%)

Core Advantages of Taking Part 1 First:

• Builds the Internal Operating Baseline: You cannot analyze a strategic capital investment decision or corporate restructuring in Part 2 without first understanding standard costing, variance analysis, and contribution margins from Part 1.
• Heavy Computational Grounding: Part 1 covers overhead absorption, flexible budgets, and activity-based costing (ABC). Mastering these multi-step computations early sharpens your formula discipline for the quantitative hurdles ahead.
• Broad Conceptual Overlap: If you recently completed undergraduate or graduate managerial accounting coursework, Part 1 closely mirrors university curricula, accelerating your study pace.

---

2. When Should You Start with Part 2 (Strategic Financial Management)?

Part 2 evaluates strategic financial leadership across six core domains:

1. Financial Statement Analysis (20%)
2. Corporate Finance (20%)
3. Decision Analysis (25%)
4. Risk Management (10%)
5. Investment Decisions (10%)
6. Professional Ethics (15%)

Profiles That Succeed by Taking Part 2 First:

• Finance Majors and Financial Analysts: If your daily responsibilities involve discounted cash flow (DCF) modeling, Net Present Value (NPV), working capital optimization, and financial statement ratios, Part 2 leverages your everyday vocabulary.
• Candidates Needing an Early Momentum Win: Many candidates find Part 2 conceptually more intuitive than the detailed cost allocation mechanics of Part 1. Clearing Part 2 first locks in a passed section and establishes strong momentum.
• Short-Window Test Takers: Decision analysis and corporate finance formulas share tight thematic synergy, enabling focused candidates to review Part 2 in fewer total study hours than the broader Part 1 syllabus.

---

The 2026 CBQ Exam Redesign: How Format Shifts Impact Sequencing

In September 2026, the ICMA is modernizing the exam format from traditional free-form text essays to structured Computer-Based Questions (CBQs):

• What Changes: Rather than writing open narrative paragraphs, candidates will interact with realistic exhibits, formatted spreadsheets, and multi-part decision prompts.
• Sequencing Impact: Candidates preparing in mid-2026 who prefer familiar essay questions should aim to take their first part prior to the September 2026 window. Those who excel at spreadsheet modeling and analytical data interpretation will find the post-September CBQ format highly advantageous for both sections.

---

ICMA Rules: The 3-Year Rolling Expiration Window

When scheduling your CMA exam windows (January/February, May/June, September/October), keep ICMA administrative guidelines in mind:

• The 3-Year Clock: Once you pay the CMA entrance fee, you have three full years (36 months) to pass both Part 1 and Part 2.
• Rolling Section Expiration: If you pass one part but do not pass the second part within three years of entering the CMA program, your passed part expires, and you must repurchase the entrance fee and retake the expired section.
• Optimal Spacing: Most successful candidates space the two sections across consecutive testing windows (typically 3 to 6 months apart), requiring approximately 150 to 180 study hours per part.

---

Worked Sequencing Scenario: Coordinating the 3-Year Candidacy Clock

Entering the CMA program requires paying the IMA Entrance Fee, which starts a strict three-year candidacy clock to complete both Part 1 and Part 2. Consider how candidate background dictates optimal sequencing:

• Corporate Accounting & Cost Backgrounds: Starting with Part 1 (Planning, Budgeting, and Forecasting) capitalizes on operational familiarities, allowing you to bank a passing credit within 90 days.
• Treasury, Banking & Financial Analysis Backgrounds: Starting with Part 2 (Working Capital, Capital Structure, and Decision Analysis) builds immediate confidence, letting you tackle the denser operational formulas of Part 1 with momentum.
• Testing Windows: CMA exams are offered only in three two-month windows annually: January/February, May/June, and September/October. Plan for 8-10 weeks of study per part to sit comfortably within consecutive windows.

Frequently asked questions

Is CMA Part 1 or Part 2 harder?

Part 1 is historically considered harder by candidates with general accounting backgrounds due to its heavy focus on cost allocation, flexible budgeting, and technical variance analysis. Part 2 is often considered more challenging for candidates who struggle with complex financial ratio interpretation, capital asset pricing (CAPM), and bond/equity valuation. Both parts share comparable global pass rates hovering around 45% to 50%.

Can I take CMA Part 2 before Part 1?

Yes. The ICMA imposes no sequence requirements. You can register for and pass Part 2 before sitting for Part 1. Finance professionals, financial planners, and treasury analysts routinely take Part 2 first to capitalize on their professional strengths.

How much study time is needed for each CMA part?

Most candidates require:

• Part 1 (Financial Planning & Analytics): 150 to 180 hours
• Part 2 (Strategic Financial Management): 140 to 170 hours

Candidates studying 12 to 15 hours per week typically complete each part in 8 to 12 weeks of structured preparation.

Do I have to take both CMA parts in the same testing window?

No. While candidates are permitted to take both parts in the same testing window, sitting for both parts back-to-back creates immense mental fatigue. The vast majority of candidates space the parts across consecutive windows (for example, taking Part 1 in January/February and Part 2 in May/June).

What happens if my 3-year CMA candidacy window expires?

If you do not pass both parts within 3 years of paying your CMA entrance fee, credit for any passed part expires. You must pay a new entrance fee and pass both parts again to earn the credential.

Worked Example: Study Sequencing and Investment Decision Matrix

For example, let us say Candidate Alex is preparing for the examination with 15 hours per week of study time and a preparation budget of $300. Assume Alex has two years of related professional accounting or audit experience.

Worked scenario: Maximizing pass velocity under testing windows

• Option A (Comprehensive Active Recall): Alex enrolls in VoraPrep for $199 annually, drilling scenario questions daily in authentic 1:1 Prometric mode. Alex achieves an 82% practice baseline across all blueprint areas.
• Option B (Passive Video Study): Alex spends $2,000+ on commercial video packages, spending 100 hours watching lectures without solving simulated testlet problems.
• Outcome: Active retrieval practice saves Alex an estimated 60 total preparation hours while avoiding multi-thousand dollar upfront debt commitments.

Related VoraPrep resources

• CMA Exam Part Order (2026) — Part 1 vs Part 2 sequencing strategy and CBQ timing
• Best CMA Review Courses (2026) — Comparison of VoraPrep, Gleim, Hock, and Surgent
• CMA 2026 CBQ Format Transition — How the September 2026 spreadsheet exam changes impact study
• CMA Review Course Pricing — Complete ICMA Prometric test simulation and analytics
• VoraPrep CMA Study Center — Adaptive question engine and active recall drills

Official resources and references

• Institute of Management Accountants (IMA) — Official CMA handbook, syllabus updates, and testing windows
• ICMA Examination Rules — Prometric exam scheduling, CBQ transition dates, and passing criteria