EA Exam · 14 min read Updated

EA Representation & Ethics: Preparer penalties and due diligence — Complete Study Guide

Rob Pfleghardt

10-year Price Waterhouse alumnus · Founder of VoraPrep · Former CPA (1987–2024) · with the VoraPrep Editorial Team

EA Representation & Ethics: Preparer penalties and due diligence — Complete Study Guide

Key Takeaways

  • The exam tests your judgment on preparer intent, not just your memory of penalty amounts.
  • An "unreasonable position" penalty under IRC §6694(a) can be avoided if the position has a reasonable basis and is disclosed on Form 8275.
  • Failing to meet specific due diligence for credits like the EITC (e.g., not completing Form 8867) triggers a separate $630 penalty, even if the client was eligible.
  • The most severe penalties under IRC §6694(b) apply to willful or reckless conduct, such as ignoring clear IRS guidance to generate a larger refund.
  • Only individuals who meet the IRC §7701(a)(36) definition of a "tax return preparer"—someone who prepares returns for compensation—are subject to these penalties.
  • All penalty amounts are adjusted for inflation; using outdated figures from old study materials is a common cause of wrong answers.

In 2023 alone, the IRS assessed over $13 million in civil penalties against tax return preparers. Many candidates see those figures and assume the exam is about memorizing penalty amounts, but that's the number one reason they fail these questions. The real trap isn't forgetting if a penalty is $65 or $630; it's failing to distinguish the preparer's conduct that triggers a $1,120 penalty versus the conduct that triggers a $5,590 penalty for the exact same tax understatement.

Quick answer

Preparer penalties and due diligence are tested on EA SEE Part 3, covering sanctions for tax preparers under IRC §§6694, 6695, and Circular 230. Mastery requires applying the correct penalty based on the preparer's conduct, such as an unreasonable position versus willful disregard of rules.

Key facts

  • Relevant Exam Section: SEE Part 3 (Representation, Practices, and Procedures)
  • Primary Governing Rules: IRC §§6694, 6695; Treasury Dept. Circular 230
  • Key Penalty (Unreasonable Position): Greater of $1,120 or 50% of preparer's fee (IRC §6694(a) for 2026)
  • Key Penalty (Willful Conduct): Greater of $5,590 or 75% of preparer's fee (IRC §6694(b) for 2026)
  • Due Diligence Penalty (EITC, etc.): $630 per failure, per credit (IRC §6695(g) for 2026)
  • Official Body: Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

What Are the Core Preparer Penalties on the EA Exam?

The core preparer penalties are monetary sanctions the IRS can impose on tax return preparers for specific failures ranging from simple administrative errors to intentional fraud. These rules, primarily found in Internal Revenue Code sections 6694 and 6695, are heavily tested on SEE Part 3 because they form the legal backbone of an Enrolled Agent's professional responsibility. Your ability to correctly identify the violation and apply the corresponding penalty is crucial.

The exam requires you to differentiate between three main categories of penalties. Understanding this framework is the first step.

Free 5-Min Diagnostic

Studying for EA SEE3? Benchmark your score in 5 minutes.

Get an instant weak-spot assessment and a custom 12-week study plan PDF generated for your exam window.

  1. Understatement Penalties (IRC §6694): These are the most complex and heavily tested. They apply when a preparer's action (or inaction) leads to an understatement of the client's tax liability. The penalty amount depends entirely on the preparer's level of fault.
  2. Due Diligence & Administrative Penalties (IRC §6695): These are generally fixed-dollar penalties for specific procedural failures, like forgetting to sign a return or not keeping required records. The penalty for failing to meet due diligence requirements for certain tax credits falls here and is a major focus area.
  3. Ethical Sanctions (Circular 230): While not a monetary penalty from the IRC, violations can lead to sanctions from the IRS Office of Professional Responsibility, including censure, suspension, or disbarment from practice.

Here is a quick-reference table summarizing the key distinctions you must know for the exam.

Penalty CategoryTriggering ConductKey Standard / Rule2026 Penalty Amount
Unreasonable PositionTaking a tax position without substantial authority (if undisclosed) or reasonable basis (if disclosed).IRC §6694(a)Greater of $1,120 or 50% of the preparer's fee.
Willful/Reckless ConductIntentionally disregarding rules or being reckless in an attempt to understate tax liability.IRC §6694(b)Greater of $5,590 or 75% of the preparer's fee.
Due Diligence FailureFailing to meet knowledge, documentation, or checklist requirements for EITC, CTC, AOTC, etc.IRC §6695(g)$630 per failure, per credit, per return.
Administrative FailuresFailing to sign the return, provide a copy to the taxpayer, or include PTIN.IRC §6695(a-d)$65 per failure (max caps apply).

Before you get lost in the details, try VoraPrep's free EA practice questions to see how these concepts are presented in exam-style scenarios. For a comprehensive overview of what it takes to become an EA, explore our guide on EA exam requirements and eligibility.

How Does the IRS Define and Penalize Understatements? (IRC §6694)

The penalties under IRC §6694 are the most challenging because they require you to analyze a fact pattern and judge the preparer's state of mind. Mastering this nuanced application is key to improving your EA exam pass rates, which typically range from 60-70%. Understanding the core differences between these penalties is a critical component of building your expertise as an Enrolled Agent.

The "Unreasonable Position" Penalty (IRC §6694(a))

A preparer is penalized under §6694(a) if they take a position on a return that results in a tax understatement and they did not have a realistic possibility of being sustained on its merits. The key is understanding the hierarchy of standards required to avoid this penalty.

  • For undisclosed positions: The preparer must have substantial authority for the position. This is a high standard, meaning the weight of authorities supporting the treatment is substantial in relation to those opposing it.
  • For disclosed positions: If the position is properly disclosed on Form 8275 or 8275-R, the standard drops to reasonable basis. This is a lower bar, but still requires more than just an arguable or colorable claim.

The penalty for 2026 is the greater of $1,120 or 50% of the income the preparer derived from the return. The penalty can be waived if the preparer can show there was reasonable cause for the understatement and they acted in good faith.

The "Willful or Reckless Conduct" Penalty (IRC §6694(b))

This is the most severe preparer penalty. It applies if an understatement is due to a preparer's willful attempt to understate tax liability or a reckless or intentional disregard of tax rules and regulations. "Willful" means a conscious, voluntary act. "Reckless" means making little to no effort to determine if a rule applies.

An exam question might describe a preparer who ignores a client's W-2 and instead uses a much lower, unsubstantiated income number the client provides verbally to maximize a credit. This is a classic example of reckless disregard.

The penalty for 2026 is the greater of $5,590 or 75% of the income the preparer derived from the return. There is no "reasonable cause" defense for this penalty.

What Are the Other Key Preparer Penalties? (IRC §6695 & Circular 230)

Beyond understatements, the IRS penalizes specific procedural and due diligence failures under IRC §6695. These are often tested as "add-on" penalties in larger scenario questions, reflecting the comprehensive nature of an Enrolled Agent's responsibilities.

Specific Due Diligence Failures (IRC §6695(g))

This is a critical, frequently tested area. For returns claiming the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), Child Tax Credit (CTC/ACTC/ODC), or the American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC), a preparer has a specific, heightened due diligence responsibility.

They must:

  1. Complete and submit Form 8867, Paid Preparer's Due Diligence Checklist.
  2. Interview the taxpayer and ask adequate questions to resolve inconsistencies.
  3. Retain records and documentation used to determine eligibility.

Failure to meet these requirements for each applicable credit triggers a $630 penalty (for 2026) per failure. Forgetting to complete Form 8867 for a return claiming both the EITC and CTC would result in two penalties, totaling $1,260.

Administrative Penalties (IRC §6695(a)-(f))

These are strict liability penalties for procedural oversights. For 2026, the most common are:

✨ Free Study Planner

Calculate Your Required EA Study Hours

See exactly how many hours you need across SEE 1, 2, and 3 based on your experience and target test window.

Calculate EA Study Hours →
  • Failure to Furnish Copy to Taxpayer (§6695(a)): $65 per failure.
  • Failure to Sign Return (§6695(b)): $65 per failure.
  • Failure to Furnish PTIN (§6695(c)): $65 per failure.
  • Failure to Retain Copy or List (§6695(d)): $65 per failure.
  • Negotiation of Refund Check (§6695(f)): $590 per check. This is a severe violation also prohibited by Circular 230.

The Role of Treasury Circular 230

Circular 230 provides the broad ethical and professional standards for practicing before the IRS. While it doesn't impose its own monetary penalties, violating its standards (like the duty of due diligence in Section 10.22) is often the root cause of conduct that triggers IRC penalties. Severe or repeated violations can lead to IRS sanctions like censure, suspension, or permanent disbarment. Understanding these ethical obligations is as crucial as knowing the tax code itself, impacting everything from your daily practice to your potential Enrolled Agent salary.

Worked Example: Calculating Total Preparer Penalties (2026 Rules)

Let's apply these updated 2026 rules to a realistic exam scenario. This is how you must think to get the question right.

Scenario: Elara, an Enrolled Agent, prepared the 2025 federal income tax return for her client, Mr. Henderson. During their interview, Mr. Henderson mentioned a significant business loss from a prior year. Elara, without requesting any documentation or reviewing prior-year returns, accepted his verbal assertion of a $50,000 net operating loss (NOL) carryforward and applied it. Elara also included an Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) on the return. She did not complete Form 8867. Due to a busy tax season, Elara forgot to sign the completed return. Her fee was $400. Question: The IRS later determines the $50,000 NOL was entirely unsubstantiated, resulting in a tax understatement. What is the total amount of preparer penalties Elara is subject to under IRC §§6694 and 6695 for the 2025 return, using 2026 penalty rates?
A. $1,815
B. $6,285
C. $5,590
D. $1,185

---

Step-by-step reasoning process:
  1. Identify the Preparer Status: Elara is an EA preparing a return for a fee. She is a "tax return preparer" and subject to all penalties.
  2. Analyze the NOL Issue (IRC §6694):
  • The facts state Elara accepted a large, "entirely unsubstantiated" NOL "without requesting any documentation." This is the examiner's signal for a high level of fault. It goes beyond simple negligence.
  • This conduct represents a reckless disregard of the rules requiring substantiation for deductions. It is not merely an "unreasonable position" that might have a defense.
  • Therefore, the penalty under IRC §6694(b) for willful or reckless conduct applies.
  • The penalty is the greater of $5,590 or 75% of the preparer's fee (75% of $400 = $300).
  • Penalty for the NOL issue = $5,590.
  1. Analyze the EITC Due Diligence Issue (IRC §6695(g)):
  • Elara claimed the EITC but "did not complete Form 8867." This is a direct violation of the specific due diligence requirements.
  • The penalty under IRC §6695(g) applies.
  • Penalty for EITC due diligence failure = $630.
  1. Analyze the Signing Requirement Issue (IRC §6695(b)):
  • Elara "forgot to sign the completed return." This is a straightforward administrative failure.
  • The penalty under IRC §6695(b) applies.
  • Penalty for failure to sign = $65.
  1. Calculate the Total Penalties:
  • IRC §6694(b) penalty (NOL): $5,590
  • IRC §6695(g) penalty (EITC): $630
  • IRC §6695(b) penalty (Signing): $65
  • Total Penalties = $5,590 + $630 + $65 = $6,285.

---

The tempting wrong answer and why it's wrong:

The most tempting wrong answer is A. $1,815. This answer results from misinterpreting the NOL issue as a lower-level "unreasonable position" under IRC §6694(a).

  • How to get to $1,815: You would calculate the §6694(a) penalty (greater of $1,120 or 50% of $400 fee = $1,120), add the EITC penalty ($630), and add the failure-to-sign penalty ($65). $1,120 + $630 + $65 = $1,815.
  • Why it's wrong: The keywords "entirely unsubstantiated" and "without requesting any documentation" are designed to push you toward the higher standard of reckless conduct. On the exam, you must read the facts carefully to judge the preparer's actions against the statutory language.

The correct answer is B. $6,285. Mastering these distinctions is what separates a pass from a fail, and VoraPrep's adaptive learning engine helps you practice these scenarios until they become second nature.

Test Your Knowledge: Preparer Penalty Practice Questions

Ready to test your understanding with the correct 2026 figures?

Sample Q1: Liam, a tax preparer, took an unreasonable position on a 2025 return that was not disclosed. The position lacked substantial authority and resulted in a tax understatement. Liam's fee was $300. What is the penalty Liam is subject to under IRC §6694(a)?

A. $150
B. $300
C. $1,120
D. $5,590
Explanation: The question specifies an "unreasonable position" that "lacked substantial authority" and was not disclosed. This is a classic IRC §6694(a) violation. The penalty is the greater of $1,120 or 50% of the preparer's fee. Here, 50% of $300 is $150. The greater amount is $1,120. Correct Answer: C

Sample Q2: Sarah, an Enrolled Agent, knowingly understated a client's tax liability on their 2025 return by intentionally disregarding a clear IRS regulation. The fee Sarah charged for the return was $8,000. What is the penalty Sarah is subject to under IRC §6694(b)?

A. $1,120
B. $5,590
C. $6,000
D. $8,000
Explanation: "Knowingly understated" and "intentionally disregarding" signal willful conduct under IRC §6694(b). The penalty is the greater of $5,590 or 75% of the preparer's fee. Here, 75% of $8,000 is $6,000. The greater amount is $6,000. Correct Answer: C

Sample Q3: David, an EA, prepared a 2025 tax return for a client but forgot to sign it. He also failed to provide the client with a copy of the completed return. What is the total amount of penalties David is subject to under IRC §6695 for these two failures?

A. $65
B. $130
C. $630
D. $1,120
Explanation: This question involves two separate administrative penalties under IRC §6695. Failure to sign the return (§6695(b)) is a $65 penalty. Failure to furnish a copy to the taxpayer (§6695(a)) is another $65 penalty. The total penalty is $65 + $65 = $130. Correct Answer: B

How Should You Study for Preparer Penalty Questions?

Focus your study time on application, not just memorization. Once you understand the basic rules, spend the majority of your time working through scenario-based questions. To effectively prepare, consider how long you should study for the EA exam and build a realistic study plan.

On exam day, read every fact pattern carefully. Look for the specific words the IRS uses to signal intent: "inadvertently," "reasonable cause," "good faith," "reckless," "willful," "knowingly." These words are your clues to selecting the right penalty section. A question that mentions "failure to complete Form 8867" is a direct signal for the IRC §6695(g) penalty, no matter what other facts are present.

Remember that these penalties are interconnected with Circular 230. A preparer who is reckless enough to trigger a §6694(b) penalty has certainly violated their due diligence duty under Circular 230 Section 10.22. Understanding this framework helps you see the bigger picture of professional responsibility that the exam is designed to test. For more insights on exam strategy, check out our guide on how long to study for the EA exam.

---

Ready to Pass Your EA Exam? VoraPrep offers an unparalleled EA exam prep experience with over 3,000 practice questions, an adaptive learning engine that targets your weak areas, and the Vory tutor available 24/7. Our affordable plans start at just $19/month or $149/year.

Visit voraprep.com to get started and experience the VoraPrep difference.

Start Your Free 14-Day Trial at voraprep.com →

Frequently asked questions

Who is considered a "tax return preparer" by the IRS?

A "tax return preparer" is any person who prepares for compensation, or who employs one or more persons to prepare for compensation, any tax return or claim for refund of tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. This definition, found in IRC §7701(a)(36), is crucial because only individuals meeting it are subject to the preparer penalties discussed.

Can preparer penalties be waived?

Some preparer penalties, specifically those under IRC §6694(a) for unreasonable positions, can be waived if the preparer can demonstrate that there was reasonable cause for the understatement and that they acted in good faith. However, penalties for willful or reckless conduct under IRC §6694(b) and certain administrative penalties under IRC §6695 typically do not have a reasonable cause defense.

How does Circular 230 relate to IRC preparer penalties?

Treasury Department Circular 230 sets forth the ethical and professional standards for tax practitioners practicing before the IRS. While the IRC imposes monetary penalties, violations of Circular 230 standards, such as failing to exercise due diligence, often constitute the underlying conduct that triggers IRC penalties. Severe or repeated Circular 230 violations can also lead to suspension or disbarment from practice before the IRS.

Are preparer penalty amounts adjusted annually?

Yes, the specific dollar amounts for preparer penalties under IRC §§6694 and 6695 are adjusted for inflation annually by the IRS. These adjustments are typically released in a Revenue Procedure late in the year for the upcoming tax season. It's critical to use the most current figures for the exam, which for this article means the 2026 rates.
⚡ Instant Knowledge Check · 1-Click Test Drive
SEE Part 3: Representation, Practices and Procedures

Under Treasury Department Circular 230 §10.21 (Knowledge of Client's Omission), what is an Enrolled Agent required to do upon discovering that a client has made an error on, or omission from, a previously filed federal tax return?

Official resources and references

RP

About the Author: Rob Pfleghardt

Rob Pfleghardt is the founder of VoraPrep, a comprehensive exam prep platform for the CPA, CMA, EA, CIA, CISA, and CFP exams. A Virginia Tech graduate in Accounting and Finance, Rob began his career at Price Waterhouse, spending a decade in audit and IT consulting. After holding a CPA license for 37 years (1987–2024) and successfully scaling his own enterprise IT consultancy serving the Department of Defense, Rob launched VoraPrep. He now leverages his deep systems architecture background to build the adaptive training technology and curriculum that helps candidates pass their certification exams efficiently.

Connect with Rob on LinkedIn →
Free Diagnostic Assessment

Find your exact EA weak spots in 10 minutes.

Most candidates fail because they study blindly. Take our free 10-question diagnostic to identify your weakest blueprint topics and receive a custom 12-week study plan PDF generated instantly.

Keep reading

Free 5-min EA diagnostic + 12-week plan PDF

Start →
EA 1:1 Prometric Simulator

3,000+ practice questions with instant Socratic feedback