Hey, welcome to VoraPrep Audio. Glad you could tune in.
Let's talk about a situation you'll definitely face in investment banking. Your managing director walks over. They drop a file on your desk—or more likely, they ping you on Slack. They say, "I need a quick workup on this company. It's a potential M and A target. Tell me what you see." And they need it fast.
This is a critical skill. It’s not just about finding numbers. It’s about knowing which numbers matter. You need to understand the story they tell. And you have to read between the lines of those dense S.E.C. filings. Think of yourself as a financial detective. Or maybe a doctor, trying to quickly diagnose the health of a business.
Think of it this way. The company’s public filings are its medical charts. There are three main ones you’ll be looking at.
First is the Form 10-K. Think of this as the big, annual physical. It's comprehensive and audited by an outside firm. It has everything. You get the full financial statements. You get management’s story on how things are going—that's the M.D. and A. section. It also includes all the risks and legal details. If you want the deep, foundational truth, you start with the 10-K.
But a lot can happen in a year. So, you also have the Form 10-Q. This is the quarterly check-up. It's not as detailed, and it’s usually unaudited, but it gives you the latest trends. Is revenue growing this quarter? Did margins slip? The 10-Q is crucial for seeing the most recent performance.
Then there’s the Form 8-K. This one’s different. It’s not on a schedule. An 8-K is like getting an urgent text from the company. It’s for major, unscheduled events. Things like a surprise merger, the C.E.O. suddenly resigning, a big asset sale… anything that shareholders need to know about right now. You always want to scan for recent 8-Ks. They can contain critical information that hasn’t hit the 10-Q yet.
Okay, so you’ve got the files. The 10-K for the deep history, the latest 10-Q for recent trends, and the 8-Ks for any big news. Now, what are you looking for?
One of the first things you’ll calculate is ee-BIT-dah. That stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It’s a very common metric. It serves as a quick proxy for a company’s operating cash flow. But you have to be careful. The raw ee-BIT-dah number from the income statement can be misleading.
It often includes one-time events that aren't part of the core, repeatable business. And for valuation, you only care about the core, repeatable business. So, we have to clean it up. We have to "normalize" it.
Let's walk through an example. Say a company reports ee-BIT-dah of one hundred million dollars. Okay. But you read the notes and see they had a one-time gain of ten million dollars because they sold an old factory. Well, they can’t sell that same factory next year. That’s not part of their core business. It’s a one-time event. So you have to subtract it. One hundred million minus ten million gets you to ninety million.
Then you keep reading. You find out they also had five million dollars in restructuring charges because they closed down a failed business line. That’s also a one-off event. It’s an expense that, hopefully, won't happen again next year. Since it dragged down the reported earnings, you need to add it back. This shows what the core business really earned. So, you take that ninety million and add back the five million in restructuring costs.
Your normalized ee-BIT-dah is ninety-five million dollars. Not one hundred million. That's the number you’d use for valuation multiples. It gives you a much more honest look at the company’s true, ongoing profitability. You’re just taking out the unusual items. You add back one-time expenses and subtract one-time gains.
Another key piece of the diagnosis is working capital. The formula is simple: Current Assets minus Current Liabilities. This tells you about the company’s short-term liquidity. In other words, can it pay its bills over the next year? On the asset side, you're looking at things like cash, accounts receivable, and inventory. On the liability side, you have accounts payable and short-term debt.
But here’s a classic trap. Don't confuse working capital with cash. They are not the same thing. An increase in working capital can actually be a bad sign for cash flow. Imagine a company goes on a buying spree and doubles its inventory. Inventory is a current asset, so its working capital goes up. Looks good on the surface, right? But where did the money to buy all that inventory come from? Cash. They spent cash. So while working capital increased, their cash position got worse.
Always look at the components of working capital, not just the total. For example, a big jump in accounts receivable could be a red flag. It might mean the company isn't collecting cash from its customers efficiently.
So, when that managing director asks for the workup, what’s your process?
It's pretty logical. First, clarify the goal. Are we thinking about buying this company? Lending to them? That objective tells you what to focus on. Then you pull the right files—the 10-K, 10-Q, and any 8-Ks.
Once you have the documents, you extract the key numbers. You calculate those core metrics we just discussed. First, get the raw ee-BIT-dah. Then, read the notes to find any non-recurring items. Adjust for those to get a clean, normalized ee-BIT-dah. At the same time, calculate working capital. More importantly, look at how its pieces are trending. Is inventory ballooning? Are receivables stretching out?
Finally, you put the story together. Don't just present a list of numbers. You need to interpret them. For example, you might say: "Normalized ee-BIT-dah is strong and growing. But I'm concerned about their cash flow. Working capital is rising because their inventory has shot up in the last two quarters. This might signal a sales slowdown." That’s the kind of insight that’s useful for the deal team.
Let's try one. A company reports ee-BIT-dah of seventy-five million dollars. In the footnotes, you see they had a one-time gain of twelve million from selling their headquarters. They also had a non-recurring legal settlement that cost them eight million dollars. What's the normalized ee-BIT-dah?
Just think it through. Start with the seventy-five million. The gain from selling the building… is that part of their core, day-to-day business? Nope. So we subtract it. Seventy-five million minus twelve million is sixty-three million. Now, what about that legal settlement? That’s a one-time expense that dragged down earnings. To see what the core business did without that event, we have to add it back. So, sixty-three million plus eight million gives you seventy-one million dollars. That’s your answer.
Here’s another one, focusing on working capital. A company has one hundred fifty million dollars in current assets and eighty million in current liabilities. Then, in the next quarter, they buy a ton of extra inventory, but sales don't change. What happens to working capital and cash flow?
Well, inventory is a current asset. If it goes up, and nothing else changes, total current assets go up. That means working capital—Current Assets minus Current Liabilities—also goes up. But how did they pay for that inventory? With cash. So, their cash flow for the period goes down. See the difference? Working capital up, cash flow down. That’s a critical distinction.
Alright, let's review the key takeaways. Remember those S.E.C. filings. The 10-K is the annual, audited deep dive. The 10-Q is the quarterly, unaudited update. And the 8-K is the urgent alert for major, unscheduled news.
When you get to ee-BIT-dah, always normalize it. Add back the one-time costs and subtract the one-time gains. You want the real story of the core business.
And for working capital, remember it’s a snapshot of liquidity. But it is not the same as cash. An increase in inventory or receivables will boost working capital. But it can also drain your cash. Always investigate the reason why.
VoraPrep is a full exam-prep app — lessons, practice questions, and an A.I. tutor in one place. Get started at Vora Prep dot com.